Quality Threshold
This is the minimum quality score you are willing to accept. Below this threshold, the response quality is not stable enough.
One of the most common illusions in LLM systems is "I just tried a few examples and it seems better." A truly reliable engineering process does not rely on gut feelings, but uses evaluation sets, thresholds, and version comparisons to continuously verify: what exactly did this change improve, and did it break anything elsewhere.
First select a task type, then adjust the thresholds. The page will instantly judge which versions can pass the line, and which ones, although higher in some metric, do not meet the overall deployment criteria.
The few examples you manually test may happen to be those the model excels at, failing to cover the real online distribution.
Humans easily remember a few brilliant successful outputs while ignoring infrequent but costly errors.
Without preset thresholds, the team falls into debates of "I think it's fine" versus "I think it's not stable enough" every time.
A change may improve one scenario while quietly degrading another. Without regression testing, it is hard to detect in time.
First clarify what exactly to evaluate — accuracy, citation quality, safe refusal, or latency cost.
Collect data covering real scenarios, avoiding looking only at a few pretty examples.
Compare every change against the baseline version, checking not only "did it get better" but also "did it get worse."
Automatically block when key metrics fail to meet thresholds, preventing problematic versions from going live directly.